×

Research on the fresh agricultural product supply chain coordination with supply disruptions. (English) Zbl 1264.90015

Summary: We develop a dynamic model in a one-supplier-one-retailer fresh agricultural product supply chain that experiences supply disruptions during the planning horizon. The optimal solutions in the centralized and decentralized supply chains are studied. It is found that the retailer’s optimal order quantity and the maximum total supply chain profit in the decentralized supply chain with wholesale price contract are less than that in the centralized supply chain. A two-part tariff contract is proposed to coordinate the decentralized supply chain with which the maximum profit can be achieved. It is found that the optimal wholesale price should be a decreasing piecewise function of the final output. To ensure that the supplier and the retailer both have incentives to accept the coordination contract, a lump-sum fee is offered. The interval of lump-sum fee is given leaving both the supplier and the retailer better off with the two-part tariff contract.

MSC:

90B06 Transportation, logistics and supply chain management
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.015 · Zbl 1137.91512 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.12.015
[2] DOI: 10.1016/S1874-8651(09)60009-0 · doi:10.1016/S1874-8651(09)60009-0
[3] Forecasting 30 (5) pp 42– (2011)
[4] DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.004 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.004
[5] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.033 · Zbl 1292.90034 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.033
[6] Supply chain contracting and coordination with stochastic demand pp 233– (1999)
[7] Modeling supply chain contracts: a review pp 197– (1998)
[8] Supply chain coordination with contracts (2003)
[9] Marketing Science 2 (3) pp 239– (1983) · doi:10.1287/mksc.2.3.239
[10] DOI: 10.1287/mksc.6.4.375 · doi:10.1287/mksc.6.4.375
[11] DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.009 · Zbl 1283.91083 · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2007.10.009
[12] DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2003.12.002 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2003.12.002
[13] DOI: 10.1007/s10479-005-6236-6 · Zbl 1112.90305 · doi:10.1007/s10479-005-6236-6
[14] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.076 · Zbl 1125.90349 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2005.02.076
[15] DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.008 · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2006.02.008
[16] DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.006 · Zbl 1157.90438 · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.006
[17] DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.017 · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.10.017
[18] DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2011.08.017 · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2011.08.017
[19] DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.04.010 · Zbl 1251.90042 · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2011.04.010
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.