Tang, Liansheng Larry; Balakrishnan, N. A random-sum Wilcoxon statistic and its application to analysis of ROC and LROC data. (English) Zbl 1197.62045 J. Stat. Plann. Inference 141, No. 1, 335-344 (2011). Summary: The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic is commonly used for a distribution-free comparison of two groups. One requirement for its use is that the sample sizes of the two groups are fixed. This is violated in some of the applications such as medical imaging studies and diagnostic marker studies; in the former, the violation occurs since the number of correctly localized abnormal images is random, while in the latter the violation is due to some subjects not having observable measurements. For this reason, we propose a random-sum Wilcoxon statistic for comparing two groups in the presence of ties, and derive its variance as well as its asymptotic distribution for large sample sizes. The proposed statistic includes the regular Wilcoxon rank-sum statistic. Finally, we apply the proposed statistic for summarizing location response operating characteristic data from a liver computed tomography study, and also for summarizing diagnostic accuracy of biomarker data. Cited in 2 Documents MSC: 62G10 Nonparametric hypothesis testing 62E20 Asymptotic distribution theory in statistics 62P10 Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis 92C55 Biomedical imaging and signal processing 92C50 Medical applications (general) Keywords:diagnostic accuracy; distribution-free comparison; random-sum statistic; tomography study PDFBibTeX XMLCite \textit{L. L. Tang} and \textit{N. Balakrishnan}, J. Stat. Plann. Inference 141, No. 1, 335--344 (2011; Zbl 1197.62045) Full Text: DOI Link References: [1] Chakraborty, D.; Winter, L., Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment, Radiology, 174, 3, 873-881 (1990), URL: \( \langle\) http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/\(174/3/873 \rangle \) [2] Chakraborty, D. P., Maximum likelihood analysis of free-response receiver operating characteristic (fROC) data, Medical Physics, 16, 4, 561-568 (1989), URL: \( \langle\) http://link.aip.org/link/?MPH/\(16/561/1 \rangle \) [3] Gnedenko, B. V.; Korolev, V. Y., Random Summation: Limit Theorems and Applications (1996), CRC Press · Zbl 0857.60002 [4] Goddard, M. J.; Hinberg, I., Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and non-normal data: an empirical study, Statistics in Medicine, 9, 325-337 (1990) [5] Guiasu, S., On the asymptotic distribution of the sequences of random variables with random indices, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 42, 6, 2018-2028 (1971), URL: \( \langle\) http://www.jstor.org/stable/\(2240129 \rangle \) · Zbl 0229.60026 [6] Hanley, J.; McNeil, B., The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 143, 29-36 (1982) [7] Kallergi, M.; Lucier, B. J.; Berman, C. G.; Hersh, M. R.; Kim, J. J.; Szabunio, M. S.; Clark, R. A., High-performance wavelet compression for mammography: localization response operating characteristic evaluation, Radiology, 238, 1, 62-73 (2006), URL: \( \langle\) http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/cgi/content/abstract/\(238/1/62 \rangle \) [8] Lehmann, E. L., Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks (1998), Holden-Day: Holden-Day San Francisco · Zbl 0354.62038 [9] Lloyd, C. J., Using smoothed receiver operating characteristic curves to summarize and compare diagnostic systems, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93, 1356-1364 (1998) [10] Perkins, N. J.; Schisterman, E. F.; Vexler, A., Receiver operating characteristic curve inference from a sample with a limit of detection, American Journal of Epidemiology, 165, 3, 325-333 (2007) [11] Robbins, H., The asymptotic distribution of the sum of a random number of random variables, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 12, 1151-1161 (1948) · Zbl 0034.22503 [12] Robbins, H., On the asymptotic distribution of the sum of a random number of random variables, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 34, 4, 162-163 (1948), URL: \( \langle\) http://www.pnas.org/content/34/4/162.short \(\rangle \) · Zbl 0030.40203 [13] Schisterman, E.; Reiser, B.; Faraggi, D., ROC analysis for markers with mass at zero, Statistics in Medicine, 25, 4, 623-638 (2006) [14] Schisterman, E.; Rotnitzky, A., Estimation of the mean of a k-sample u-statistic with missing outcomes and auxiliaries, Biometrika, 88, 3, 713-725 (2001), URL: \( \langle\) http://www.jstor.org/stable/\(2673441 \rangle \) · Zbl 0985.62083 [15] Seltzer, S.; Swensson, R.; Nawfel, R.; Lentini, J.; Kazda, I.; Judy, P., Visualization and detection-localization on computed tomographic images, Investigative Radiology, 26, 4, 285-294 (1991) [16] Starr, S. J.; Metz, C. E.; Lusted, L. B.; Goodenough, D. J., Visual detection and localization of radiographic images, Radiology, 116, 533-538 (1975) [17] Swensson, R. G., Unified measurement of observer performance in detecting and localizing target objects on images, Medical Physics, 23, 1709-1725 (1996) [18] Szasz, D., Limit theorems for the distributions of the sums of a random number of random variables, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 43, 6, 1902-1913 (1972), URL: \( \langle\) http://www.jstor.org/stable/\(2240201 \rangle \) · Zbl 0277.60015 [19] Vexler, A.; Liu, A.; Eliseeva, E.; Schisterman, E. F., Maximum likelihood ratio tests for comparing the discriminatory ability of biomarkers subject to limit of detection, Biometrics, 64, 3, 895-903 (2008) · Zbl 1145.62391 [20] Zhou, X. H.; McClish, D. K.; Obuchowski, N., Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine (2002), John Wiley & Sons: John Wiley & Sons New York · Zbl 1007.62092 This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.