×

Four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk, risk attitudes and applications to the rank-dependent expected utility model. (English) Zbl 1088.91039

Summary: This article presents various notions of risk generated by the intuitively appealing single-crossing operations between distribution functions. These stochastic orders, Bickel and Lehmann dispersion or (its equal-mean version) Quiggin’s monotone mean-preserving increase in risk and Jewitt’s location-independent risk, have proved to be useful in the study of Pareto allocations, ordering of insurance premia and other applications in the expected utility (EU) setup. These notions of risk are also relevant to the Quiggin-Yaari rank-dependent expected utility (RDEU) model of choice among lotteries. Risk aversion is modeled in the vNM expected utility model by Rothschild and Stiglitz’s mean-preserving increase in risk (MPIR). Realizing that in the broader rank-dependent setup this order is too weak to classify choice, Quiggin developed the stronger monotone MPIR for this purpose.
This paper reviews four notions of mean-preserving increase in risk-MPIR, monotone MPIR and two versions of location-independent risk (renamed here left- and right-monotone MPIR)-and shows which choice questions are consistently modeled by each of these four orders.

MSC:

91B30 Risk theory, insurance (MSC2010)
91B16 Utility theory
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Arrow, K., 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. North-Holland, Amsterdam.; Arrow, K., 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing. North-Holland, Amsterdam. · Zbl 0215.58602
[2] Bickel, P. J.; Lehmann, E. L., Descriptive statistics for non-parametric models. III. Dispersion, Annals of Statistics, 4, 1139-1158 (1976) · Zbl 0351.62031
[3] Bickel, P.J., Lehmann, E.L., 1979. Descriptive statistics for non-parametric models. IV. Spread. In: Jureckova (Ed.), Contributions to Statistics. Reidel, Dordrecht.; Bickel, P.J., Lehmann, E.L., 1979. Descriptive statistics for non-parametric models. IV. Spread. In: Jureckova (Ed.), Contributions to Statistics. Reidel, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0415.62015
[4] Chateauneuf, A., On the use of capacities in modeling uncertainty aversion and risk aversion, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 20, 343-369 (1991) · Zbl 0737.90014
[5] Chateauneuf, A., 1996. Decreasing Inequality: An Approach Through Non-Additive Models. Cahiers Eco & Maths, Paris I, p. 96.58.; Chateauneuf, A., 1996. Decreasing Inequality: An Approach Through Non-Additive Models. Cahiers Eco & Maths, Paris I, p. 96.58.
[6] Chateauneuf, A., Moyes, P., 2000. Inequality Measurement and the Weakening of the Transfer Principle. Working Paper, CERMSEM and GRAPE.; Chateauneuf, A., Moyes, P., 2000. Inequality Measurement and the Weakening of the Transfer Principle. Working Paper, CERMSEM and GRAPE.
[7] Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., Meilijson, I., 1997. More Pessimism than Greediness: A Characterization of Monotone Risk Aversion in the Rank Dependent Expected Utility Model. Cahiers Eco & Maths, Université Paris, Paris I, p. 97.53.; Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., Meilijson, I., 1997. More Pessimism than Greediness: A Characterization of Monotone Risk Aversion in the Rank Dependent Expected Utility Model. Cahiers Eco & Maths, Université Paris, Paris I, p. 97.53. · Zbl 1127.91329
[8] Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., Vergnaud, J.C., 2001. Left-Monotone Reduction of Risk, Deductible and Call. Mimeo.; Chateauneuf, A., Cohen, M., Vergnaud, J.C., 2001. Left-Monotone Reduction of Risk, Deductible and Call. Mimeo.
[9] Chew, S.; Karni, E.; Safra, Z., Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent preferences, Journal of Economic Theory, 42, 370-381 (1987) · Zbl 0632.90007
[10] Chow, Y. S.; Robbins, H., On optimal stopping rules, Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie, 2, 33-49 (1963) · Zbl 0161.16302
[11] Cohen, M., Risk aversion concepts in expected- and non-expected-utility models, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory, 20, 73-91 (1995)
[12] Diamond, P.; Stiglitz, J., Increases in risk and risk aversion, Journal of Economic Theory, 8, 337-360 (1974)
[13] Gollier, C.; Schlesinger, H., Arrow’s theorem on the optimality of deductibles: a stochastic dominance approach, Economic Theory, 7, 359-364 (1996) · Zbl 0852.90047
[14] Hadar, J.; Russel, W., Rules for ordering uncertain prospects, American Economic Review, 59, 25-34 (1969)
[15] Hanoch, G.; Levy, H., The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk, Review of Economic Studies, 36, 335-346 (1969) · Zbl 0184.45202
[16] Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Polya, G., 1934. Inequalities, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1952.; Hardy, G.H., Littlewood, J.E., Polya, G., 1934. Inequalities, second ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1952. · Zbl 0010.10703
[17] Jewitt, I., Choosing between risky prospects: the characterisation of comparative static results and location independent risk, Management Science, 35, 60-70 (1989) · Zbl 0673.90011
[18] Karni, E.; Schwartz, A., Search theory: the case of search with uncertain recall, Journal of Economic Theory, 16, 38-52 (1977) · Zbl 0366.90024
[19] Karni, E.; Schwartz, A., Two theorems on optimal stopping with backward solicitation, Journal of Applied Probability, 14, 869-875 (1977) · Zbl 0394.62062
[20] Landsberger, M.; Meilijson, I., Lotteries, insurance and star-shaped utility functions, Journal of Economic Theory, 52, 1-17 (1992) · Zbl 0721.90015
[21] Landsberger, M.; Meilijson, I., Comonotone allocations, Bickel-Lehmann dispersion and the Arrow-Pratt measure of risk aversion, Annals of Operations Research, 52, 97-106 (1994) · Zbl 0812.90028
[22] Landsberger, M.; Meilijson, I., The generating process and an extension of Jewitt’s location independent risk concept, Management Science, 40, 662-669 (1994) · Zbl 0807.90044
[23] Lorenz, M. O., Methods of measuring concentration of wealth, Journal of American Statistics Association, 9, 209-219 (1905)
[24] Machina, M. J.; Pratt, J. W., Increasing risk: some direct constructions, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14-15, 103-127 (1997) · Zbl 0886.90052
[25] Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I., 1979. Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Academic Press, New York.; Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I., 1979. Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and its Applications. Academic Press, New York. · Zbl 0437.26007
[26] Moyes, P., Inequality reducing and inequality preserving transformations of incomes: symmetric and individualistic transformations, Journal of Economic Theory, 63, 271-298 (1994) · Zbl 0810.90019
[27] Pratt, J. W., Risk aversion in the small and large, Econometrica, 32, 122-136 (1964) · Zbl 0132.13906
[28] Quiggin, J., A theory of anticipated utility, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323-343 (1982)
[29] Quiggin, J., 1992. Increasing risk : another definition. In: Chikan, A. (Ed.), Progress in Decision Utility and Risk Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht.; Quiggin, J., 1992. Increasing risk : another definition. In: Chikan, A. (Ed.), Progress in Decision Utility and Risk Theory. Kluwer, Dordrecht. · Zbl 0825.90075
[30] Ross, S., 1981. Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica 49 (3), 621-638.; Ross, S., 1981. Some stronger measures of risk aversion in the small and the large with applications. Econometrica 49 (3), 621-638. · Zbl 0471.90016
[31] Rothschild, M.; Stiglitz, J., Increasing risk. I. A definition, Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225-243 (1970)
[32] Rothschild, M.; Stiglitz, J., Increasing risk. II. Its economic consequences, Journal of Economic Theory, 3, 66-84 (1970)
[33] Strassen, V., The existence of probability measures with given marginals, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 36, 423-439 (1965) · Zbl 0135.18701
[34] Vergnaud, J. C., Analysis of risk in a non-expected utility framework and application to the optimality of the deductible, Finance, 18-1, 155-167 (1997)
[35] von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, third ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 1954.; von Neumann, J., Morgenstern, O., 1947. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, third ed. Princeton University Press, Princeton, p. 1954. · Zbl 1241.91002
[36] Wilson, R., 1968. The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36, 119-138.; Wilson, R., 1968. The theory of syndicates. Econometrica 36, 119-138.
[37] Yaari, M.E., 1984. Risk Aversion Without Diminishing Marginal Utility. International Center for Economics and Related Disciplines, London.; Yaari, M.E., 1984. Risk Aversion Without Diminishing Marginal Utility. International Center for Economics and Related Disciplines, London.
[38] Yaari, M. E., The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica, 55, 95-115 (1987) · Zbl 0616.90005
[39] Yaari, M. E., A controversial proposal concerning inequality measurement, Journal of Economic Theory, 44, 381-397 (1988) · Zbl 0638.90025
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.