Help on query formulation
Cannons at sparrows. (English)
Eur. Math. Soc. Newsl. 95, 25-31 (2015).
This fascinating and entertaining article begins with an apparently simple problem in convex geometry, due to R. Nandakumar and R. Ramana Rao: given a convex shape, can it be partitioned into $N$ pieces so that all pieces have equal area and perimeter? (This is different, except when $N=2$, from the “cake and icing problem" of dividing the region into pieces that each have the same area and the same portion of the original body’s perimeter.) The $N=2$ case can be solved easily (if unsportingly) by the use of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem. This paper summarizes further progress on the problem, which involves even more diverse heavy artillery. To even represent the topological space of equal-area partitions requires ideas from the theory of {\it optimal transport}, and particularly a 1938 theorem of Kantorovich on weighted Voronoi diagrams. Once posed in this way, the problem can be converted into a problem in equivariant algebraic topology via the “configuration space / test map scheme". If there is {\it no} solution to the original problem, then there is an equivariant map from a certain ($n-1$)-dimensional cell complex to the ($n-2$)-sphere. The existence or nonexistence of this map can be determined using equivariant obstruction theory. This in turn leads, via permutahedra, to a question (solved over a hundred years ago) about prime factors of entries in Pascal’s triangle, and the final result of the paper, due to the author and Blagojević: if $N$ is a prime power, the desired dissection exists. The paper is clear and well-written, though I was puzzled to find “equivariant obstruction theory" abbreviated as “EOS" twice. This appears to be a typo: it’s “EOT" on two other occasions.
Reviewer: Robert Dawson (Halifax)
Classification: A85 G95 F65
Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional Valid CSS!