@inbook {MATHEDUC.06589136,
author = {Lim, Kien H. and Wagler, Amy},
title = {Assessing impulsive-analytic disposition: the likelihood-to-act survey and other instruments.},
year = {2012},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 36th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education ``Opportunities to learn in mathematics education", PME 36, Taipei, Taiwan, July 18--22, 2012, Vol. 3},
pages = {131-138},
publisher = {Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University},
abstract = {Summary: The likelihood-to-act (LtA) survey is a 32-item instrument that measures impulsive and analytic dispositions in solving math problems. In this research report we compare it to other instruments related to the impulsive-analytic construct such as Frederick's Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) and the Barratt impulsive scale in terms of mean scores, Cronbach alpha values, and correlation values. Both LtA-impulsive and LtA-analytic subscales have acceptable reliabilities of 0.79 and 0.83 respectively. The LtA-analytic and LtA-difference (analytic-impulsive difference) correlated well with other the Need for cognition subscale and CRT scores. The correlations involving LtA-impulsive subscale were unexpected and call for further investigation.},
msc2010 = {C20xx (D20xx)},
identifier = {2016c.00123},
}