×

The use of fuzzy outranking relations in preference modelling. (English) Zbl 0765.90003

This paper deals with preference modelling in the context of decision aid. In order to tackle this problem, a multiple criteria methodology is proposed, mainly based on fuzzy outranking relations introduced both at one-dimensional and multi-dimensional levels. Such relations are then combined using fuzzy logical connectives to generate relational systems of fuzzy preferences.

MSC:

91B06 Decision theory
03E72 Theory of fuzzy sets, etc.
91B08 Individual preferences

Software:

ELECTRE
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Alsina, C.; Trillas, E.; Valverde, L., On some logical connectives for fuzzy set theory, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 93, 15-26 (1983) · Zbl 0522.03012
[2] Bana e. Costa, A., A methodology for sensitivity analysis in three-criteria problems: A case study in municipal management, European J. Oper. Res., 33, 159-173 (1988)
[3] Bouyssou, D., Modelling inaccurate determination, uncertainty, imprecision using multiple criteria, (Lockett, A. G.; Islei, G., Improving Decision Making in Organisations (1991), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin), 78-87
[4] Brans, J. P.; Mareschal, B.; Vincke, Ph., PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis, (Brans, J. P., Operational Research’84 (1984), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam), 408-421 · Zbl 0571.90042
[5] Dombi, J., A general class of fuzzy operators, the De Morgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8, 150-163 (1982) · Zbl 0494.04005
[6] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Ranking fuzzy numbers in the setting of possibility theory, Inform. Sci., 30, 2, 183-224 (1983) · Zbl 0569.94031
[7] Dubois, D.; Prade, H., Théorie des Possibilités (1985), Masson: Masson Paris
[8] Freeling, A. N.S., Fuzzy sets and decision analysis, IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet., 10, 341-354 (1980)
[9] Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Binary preference indices: A new look on multicriteria aggregation procedures, European J. Oper. Res., 10, 26-32 (1982) · Zbl 0481.90003
[10] Martel, J. M.; D’Avignon, G.; Couillard, M., A fuzzy outranking relation in multicriteria decision making, European J. Oper. Res., 25, 258-271 (1986) · Zbl 0587.90059
[11] Matarazzo, B., Multicriterion analysis by means of pairwise actions and criterion comparisons (MAPPAC), Appl. Math. Comput., 18, 2, 119-141 (1986) · Zbl 0592.90051
[12] Monjardet, B., Axiomatiques et propriétés des quasi-ordres, Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 63, 51-82 (1978) · Zbl 0417.06005
[13] Orlovski, S. A., Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1, 155-167 (1978) · Zbl 0396.90004
[14] Ovchinnikov, S., Means and social welfare functions in fuzzy binary relations spaces, (Kacprzyk, J.; Fedrizzi, M., Multiperson Decision Making Models uing Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (1990), Kluwer Academic Publishers: Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht), 143-154
[15] Ovchinnikov, S.; Roubens, M., On strict preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 43, 319-326 (1991) · Zbl 0747.90006
[16] Ovchinnikov, S.; Roubens, M., On fuzzy strict preference, indifference and incomparability relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49, 15-20 (1992), (this issue) · Zbl 0768.90005
[17] Perny, P., Relational systems of fuzzy preferences, construction and exploitation of relational systems of fuzzy preferences, (Extended Abstracts of the Third International Conference “Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems”. Extended Abstracts of the Third International Conference “Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems”, Paris, France (July 2-6, 1990))
[18] Ponsard, C., Spatial fuzzy consumer’s decision making: A multicriteria analysis, European J. Oper. Res., 25, 235-246 (1986) · Zbl 0601.90006
[19] Roberts, F. S., Homogeneous family of semi-orders and the theory of probabilistic consistency, J. Math. Psych., 8, 248-263 (1971) · Zbl 0223.92017
[20] Roubens, M.; Vincke, Ph., Preference Modelling, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1985), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin, No. 250
[21] Roubens, M.; Vincke, Ph., Fuzzy possibility graphs and their application to ranking fuzzy numbers, (Kacprzyck, J.; Roubens, M., Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (1988), Springer-Verlag: Springer-Verlag Berlin), 119-128, No. 30 · Zbl 0652.90005
[22] Roy, B., ELECTRE III: Un algorithme de classement fondé sur une représentation floue des préférences en présence de critères multiples, Cahiers du Centre d’Etudes de Recherche Opérationnelle, 20, 1, 3-24 (1978) · Zbl 0377.90003
[23] Roy, B., Main sources of inaccurate determination, uncertainty and imprecision in decision models, (Munier, B. R.; Shakun, M. F., Compromise, Negotiation and Group Decision (1988), Reidel: Reidel Dordrecht), 43-62
[24] Roy, B., The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods, Theory and Decision, 31, 1, 49-73 (1991)
[25] Roy, B.; Vincke, Ph., Relational systems of preference with one or more pseudo-criteria: Some new concepts and results, Management Sci., 30, 11, 1323-1335 (1984) · Zbl 0555.90002
[26] Roy, B.; Présent, M.; Silhol, D., A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated, Euorpean J. Oper. Res., 24, 318-334 (1986)
[27] Roy, B.; Vincke, Ph., Pseudo-orders: Definition, properties and numerical representation, Math. Social Sci., 14, 263-274 (1987) · Zbl 0628.90001
[28] Schweizer, B.; Sklar, A., Probabilistic Metric Spaces (1983), North-Holland: North-Holland Amsterdam · Zbl 0546.60010
[29] Trillas, E., Sobre funciones de negacion en la teoria de conjunctos diffusos, Stochastica, 3, 47-59 (1979)
[30] Vansnick, J. C., On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach), European J. Oper. Res., 24, 288-294 (1986) · Zbl 0579.90059
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.