×

Study of a low Mach nuclear core model for single-phase flows. (English. French summary) Zbl 1329.76248

Summary: This paper deals with the modelling of the coolant (water) in a nuclear reactor core. This study is based on a monophasic low Mach number model (Lmnc model) coupled to the stiffened gas law for a single-phase flow. Some analytical steady and unsteady solutions are presented for the 1D case. We then introduce a numerical scheme to simulate the 1D model in order to assess its relevance. Finally, we carry out a normal mode perturbation analysis in order to approximate 2D solutions around the 1D steady solutions.

MSC:

76M25 Other numerical methods (fluid mechanics) (MSC2010)
76Dxx Incompressible viscous fluids
65M25 Numerical aspects of the method of characteristics for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] M. Bernard, S. Dellacherie, G. Faccanoni, B. Grec and Y. Penel. Study of a low Mach nuclear core model for two-phase flows with phase transition I: stiffened gas law. (in preparation). · Zbl 1304.35529
[2] S. Dellacherie, G. Faccanoni, B. Grec and Y. Penel. Study of a low Mach nuclear core model for two-phase flows with phase transition II: tabulated EOS. (in preparation). · Zbl 1304.35529
[3] C. Calgaro, E. Creus\'{}e and T. Goudon. A hybrid finite volume – finite element method for variable density incompressible flows. J. Comput. Phys., 227(9), 4671–4696 (2008). · Zbl 1137.76037
[4] S. Dellacherie. On a low Mach nuclear core model. ESAIM: Proceedings, (to appear). · Zbl 1357.76074
[5] S. Dellacherie. On a diphasic low Mach number system. Math. Model. and Num. Anal., 39(3), 487–514 (2005). · Zbl 1075.35038
[6] D. Durran. Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: with Application to Geophysics. Springer, Texts in Applied Mathematics 32, (2010). · Zbl 1214.76001
[7] O. Le M\'{}etayer, J. Massoni and R. Saurel. Elaborating equations of state of a liquid and its vapor for two-phase flow models. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 43(3), 265–276 (2004).
[8] O. Le M\'{}etayer, J. Massoni and R. Saurel. Modelling evaporation fronts with reactive Riemann solvers. J. Comput. Phys., 205(2), 567–610 (2005). · Zbl 1088.76051
[9] E. W. Lemmon, M. O. McLinden and D. G. Friend. Thermophysical properties of fluid systems. In WebBook de Chimie NIST, Base de Donn\'{}ees Standard de R\'{}ef\'{}erence NIST Num\'{}ero 69, Eds. P.J. Linstrom and W.G. Mallard, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 20899,
[10] A. Majda & J. Sethian. The derivation and numerical solution of the equations for zero mach number combustion. Combust. Sci. Technol., 42, 185–205 (1985).
[11] Y. Penel. \'{}Etude th\'{}eorique et num\'{}erique de la d\'{}eformation d’une interface s\'{}eparant deux fluides non-miscibles ‘a bas nombre de Mach. PhD Thesis, Universit\'{}e Paris 13, France (December 2010).
[12] N. Todreas & M. Kazimi. Nuclear Systems I: Thermal Hydraulic Fundamentals. Taylor & Francis Group, 2nd edition, (2011). ESAIM: PROCEEDINGS131 Figure 5. Linear case. Above: numerical (red dashed line), exact (black circles) and asymptotic (blue solid line) solutions to Eq. (5b) at different times. Below : relative error between numerical and exact solutions (black circles) and between numerical and asymptotic solutions (blue solid line) at different times. Figure 6. Linear case. Convergence rate (logarithmic scale) in norms L\inftyand L2. Figure 7. Linear case. Comparison at time t = 1 s between numerical (red dashed line) and asymptotic solutions (blue solid line) to Syst. (5). Figure 8. Linear case (with singular charge loss). Comparison at time t = 1 s between numerical (red dashed line) solutions to Syst. (5) with (5c) replaced by (5c’) and asymptotic solutions (blue solid line) to Syst. (5). ESAIM: PROCEEDINGS133 Figure 9. Negative {\(\Phi\)} case. Comparison at time t = 1 s between numerical (red dashed line) and asymptotic solutions (blue solid line) to Syst. (5). Figure 10. Sine case. Numerical (red dashed line) and asymptotic (blue solid line) solutions to Eq. (5b) at different times. Figure 11. Alternating {\(\Phi\)} case. Numerical (red dashed line) and asymptotic (associated to {\(\Phi\)}0– blue dotted line and to {\(\Phi\)}0/5 – black dotted line) solutions to Eq. (5b) at different times. Figure 12. Alternating {\(\Phi\)} case. Evolution with respect to time of the error between numerical solution to Eq. (5b) and asymptotic solution associated to {\(\Phi\)}0/5.
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.