×

Comparing different approaches to model error modeling in robust identification. (English) Zbl 1004.93014

This paper gives three different approaches to robust identification: stochastic embedding, model error modeling and set membership identification. Each of these methods explicitly accepts the presence of bias model errors, which may motivate the term “robust identification”. The first two approaches have been developed in the statistical framework, while the latter relies on UBB error assumptions. The nominal model is obtained via least squares estimation from frequency domain data. The uncertainty associated with the model is evaluated from statistical properties of the random walk process describing the unmodeled dynamics. A discussion of asymptotic properties of all methods is presented. An example (where a nontrivial undermodeling is ensured) is given to compare these methods.

MSC:

93B30 System identification
93B35 Sensitivity (robustness)
93E24 Least squares and related methods for stochastic control systems
93C73 Perturbations in control/observation systems
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Akcay, H.; Hjalmarsson, H.; Ljung, L., On the choice of norms in system identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 41, 9, 1367-1372 (1996) · Zbl 0863.93083
[2] Braslavsky, J. H. (1999). Model error quantification via non-stationary stochastic embeddingHairdryer example; Braslavsky, J. H. (1999). Model error quantification via non-stationary stochastic embeddingHairdryer example
[3] Braslavsky, J. H., & Goodwin, G. C. (1999). A note on non-stationary stochastic embedding for modelling error quantification in the estimation of resonant systems; Braslavsky, J. H., & Goodwin, G. C. (1999). A note on non-stationary stochastic embedding for modelling error quantification in the estimation of resonant systems
[4] Chisci, L.; Garulli, A.; Vicino, A.; Zappa, G., Block recursive parallelotopic bounding in set membership identification, Automatica, 34, 1, 15-22 (1998) · Zbl 0908.93021
[5] Fogel, E.; Huang, F., On the value of information in system identification—bounded noise case, Automatica, 18, 12, 229-238 (1982) · Zbl 0433.93062
[6] Garulli, A.; Kacewicz, B. Z.; Vicino, A.; Zappa, G., Error bounds for conditional algorithms in restricted complexity set membership identification, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45, 1, 160-164 (2000) · Zbl 0971.93022
[7] Garulli, A.; Tesi, A.; Vicino, A., Robustness in identification and control. Robustness in identification and control, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 245 (1999), Springer: Springer Berlin · Zbl 0918.00041
[8] Garulli, A.; Vicino, A.; Zappa, G., Conditional central algorithms for worst-case set membership identification and filtering, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 45, 1, 14-23 (2000) · Zbl 0971.93072
[9] Giarrè, L.; Milanese, M.; Taragna, M., \(H∞\) identification and model quality evaluation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 2, 188-199 (1997) · Zbl 0870.93010
[10] Goodwin, G. C. (1999). Identification and robust control: Bridging the gap. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE Mediterranian conference on control and automation; Goodwin, G. C. (1999). Identification and robust control: Bridging the gap. In Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE Mediterranian conference on control and automation
[11] Goodwin, G. C., Braslavsky, J. H., & Seron, M. M. (1999). Non-stationary stochastic embedding for transfer function estimation. In Proceedings of the 14th IFAC World Congress; Goodwin, G. C., Braslavsky, J. H., & Seron, M. M. (1999). Non-stationary stochastic embedding for transfer function estimation. In Proceedings of the 14th IFAC World Congress · Zbl 1002.93063
[12] Hakvoort, R. G.; Van den Hof, P. M.J., Identification of probabilistic system uncertainty regions by explicit evaluation of bias and variance errors, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 42, 11, 1516-1528 (1997) · Zbl 0915.93067
[13] Kosut, R. L., Goodwin, G. C., & Polis, M. P. (1992). Special issue on system identification for robust control design. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control; Kosut, R. L., Goodwin, G. C., & Polis, M. P. (1992). Special issue on system identification for robust control design. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control
[14] Ljung, L. (1999a). Comments on model validation as set membership identification, In A. Garulli, A. Tesi, & A. Vicino (Eds.), Robustness in identification and control; Ljung, L. (1999a). Comments on model validation as set membership identification, In A. Garulli, A. Tesi, & A. Vicino (Eds.), Robustness in identification and control · Zbl 0949.93509
[15] Ljung, L. (1999b). Model validation and model error modeling. In B. Wittenmark, & A. Rantzer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Åström symposium on control; Ljung, L. (1999b). Model validation and model error modeling. In B. Wittenmark, & A. Rantzer (Eds.), Proceedings of the Åström symposium on control
[16] Ljung, L., System identification—theory for the user (1999), Prentice-Hall: Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA
[17] Ljung, L. (2000). Model error modeling and control design. In Proceedings of the IFAC symposium SYSID; Ljung, L. (2000). Model error modeling and control design. In Proceedings of the IFAC symposium SYSID
[18] Ljung, L. (2001). Estimating linear time-invariant models of nonlinear time-varying systems. European Journal of Control; Ljung, L. (2001). Estimating linear time-invariant models of nonlinear time-varying systems. European Journal of Control · Zbl 1293.93754
[19] Milanese, M. (1998). Learning models from data: the set membership approach. In Proceedings of the American control conference; Milanese, M. (1998). Learning models from data: the set membership approach. In Proceedings of the American control conference
[20] Milanese, M., & Taragna, M. (1999). Suboptimality evaluation of approximated model in \(H_∞\)Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control; Milanese, M., & Taragna, M. (1999). Suboptimality evaluation of approximated model in \(H_∞\)Proceedings of the 38th IEEE conference on decision and control
[21] Milanese, M.; Vicino, A., Optimal estimation theory for dynamic systems with unknown but bounded uncertainty: an overview, Automatica, 27, 6, 997-1009 (1991) · Zbl 0737.62088
[22] Milanese, M., Norton, J. P., Piet-Lahanier, H., & Walter, E. (Eds.). (1996). Bounding approaches to system identification; Milanese, M., Norton, J. P., Piet-Lahanier, H., & Walter, E. (Eds.). (1996). Bounding approaches to system identification · Zbl 0845.00024
[23] Poolla, K.; Khargonekar, P.; Tikku, A.; Krause, J.; Nagpal, K., A time domain approach to model validation, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39, 5, 951-959 (1994) · Zbl 0813.93011
[24] Söderström, T., & Åström, K. J. (1995). Special issue on trends in system identification. Automatica; Söderström, T., & Åström, K. J. (1995). Special issue on trends in system identification. Automatica
[25] Stenman, A., & Tjärnström, F. (2000). A nonparametric approach to model error modeling. In Proceedings of the IFAC symposium on system identification SYSID; Stenman, A., & Tjärnström, F. (2000). A nonparametric approach to model error modeling. In Proceedings of the IFAC symposium on system identification SYSID
[26] Van den Hof, P. M.J.; Heuberger, P. S.C.; Bokor, J., System identification with generalized orthonormal basis functions, Automatica, 31, 12, 1821-1834 (1995) · Zbl 0848.93013
[27] Wahlberg, B., System identification using Laguerre models, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39, 5, 1276-1282 (1991) · Zbl 0807.93065
[28] Wahlberg, B.; Ljung, L., Hard frequency-domain model error bounds from least-squares like identification techniques, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37, 7, 900-912 (1992) · Zbl 0767.93021
[29] Walter, E.; Piet-Lahanier, H., Estimation of parameter bounds from bounded-error data: a survey, Mathematics in Computer and Simulation, 32, 449-468 (1990)
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.