Language:   Search:   Contact
World of
Mathematics
Database
»ZBMATH«
MSC 2000
MSC 2010
Reviewer
Service
Subscription
»ZBMATH«
ZBMATH Database | Advanced Search Print
Read more | Try MathML | Hide
Zentralblatt MATH has released its new interface!
For an improved author identification, see the new author database of ZBMATH.

ZBMATH Database Simple Search Advanced Search Command Search

Advanced Search

Query:
Fill in the form and click »Search«...
Format:
Display: entries per page entries
Zbl 0942.03023
Dubois, Didier; Hájek, Petr; Prade, Henri
Knowledge-driven versus data-driven logics.
(English)
[J] J. Logic Lang. Inf. 9, No.1, 65-89 (2000). ISSN 0925-8531; ISSN 1572-9583/e

Summary: The starting point of this work is the gap between two distinct traditions in information engineering: knowledge representation and data-driven modelling. The first tradition emphasizes logic as a tool for representing beliefs held by an agent. The second tradition claims that the main source of knowledge is made of observed data, and generally does not use logic as a modeling tool. However, the emergence of fuzzy logic has blurred the boundaries between these two traditions by putting forward fuzzy rules as a Janus-faced tool that may represent knowledge, as well as approximate nonlinear functions representing data. This paper lays bare logical foundations of data-driven reasoning whereby a set of formulas is understood as a set of observed facts rather than a set of beliefs. Several representation frameworks are considered from this point of view: classical logic, possibility theory, belief functions, epistemic logic, fuzzy rule-based systems. Mamdani's fuzzy rules are recovered as belonging to the data-driven view. In possibility theory a third set-function, different from possibility and necessity plays a key role in the data-driven view, and corresponds to a particular modality in epistemic logic. A bi-modal logic system is presented which handles both beliefs and observations, and for which a completeness theorem is given. Lastly, our results may shed new light in deontic logic and allow for a distinction between explicit and implicit permission that standard deontic modal logics do not often emphasize.
MSC 2000:
*03B42 Logic of knowledge and belief
68T30 Knowledge representation
03B45 Modal logic, etc.
03B52 Fuzzy logic
68T27 AI logics

Keywords: possibility theory; knowledge representation; data-driven modelling; fuzzy logic; data-driven reasoning; epistemic logic; deontic logic

Login Username: Password:

Highlights
Scientific prize winners of the ICM 2010
Overhang
Lie groups, physics and geometry. An introduction for physicists, engineers and chemists.

Master Server

Zentralblatt MATH Berlin [Germany]

© FIZ Karlsruhe GmbH

Zentralblatt MATH master server is maintained by the Editorial Office in Berlin, Section Mathematics and Computer Science of FIZ Karlsruhe and is updated daily.

Other Mirror Sites



Copyright © 2013 Zentralblatt MATH | European Mathematical Society | FIZ Karlsruhe | Heidelberg Academy of Sciences
Published by Springer-Verlag | Webmaster