×

Stability of the pseudo-inverse method for reconfigurable control systems. (English) Zbl 0725.93025

Summary: One of the key reconfigurable control methods, the pseudo-inverse method (PIM), is analyzed and new insight is obtained which provides the theoretical basis for this practical approach. The main shortcoming of this method, the lack of stability guarantees, is pointed out and a new approach is proposed in which recent results on the stability robustness of linear systems are used to provide stability constraints for the solutions of the PIM. When the original PIM solution results in an unstable closed-loop system, the control redesign problem is treated as a constraint minimization problem. For single-input systems, a closed-form solution is presented; for multi-input systems, a near-optimal solution is found which maintains the stability of the closed-loop system.

MSC:

93B28 Operator-theoretic methods
93D09 Robust stability
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] BARLETT A. C., Math Control Signal Systems 1 pp 61– (1988) · Zbl 0652.93048 · doi:10.1007/BF02551236
[2] BARMISH B. R., I.E.E.E. Transactions on Automatic Control 29 pp 935– (1984) · Zbl 0549.93046 · doi:10.1109/TAC.1984.1103401
[3] CAGLAYAN A. K., Proceedings of the 1988 I.E.E.E. National Aerospace and Electronics Conference pp 520– (1988) · doi:10.1109/NAECON.1988.195057
[4] CHANDLER P. R., Proceedings of the 1984 I.E.E.E. National Aerospace and Electronics Conference pp 586– (1984)
[5] ESLINGER R. A., Proceedings of the 1988 I.E.E.E. National Aerospace and Electronics Conference pp 504– (1988) · doi:10.1109/NAECON.1988.195055
[6] FRIEDLAND B., Control System Design (1986) · Zbl 0925.93002
[7] GAVITO V. F., Proceedings of A.I.A.A. Guidance and Control Conference pp 1– (1987)
[8] GILL P. E., Practical Optimization (1981) · Zbl 0503.90062
[9] GOLUB G. H., Matrix Computations (1983) · Zbl 0559.65011
[10] HOWELL W. E., Proceedings of the A.I.A.A. Guidanceand Control Conference pp 646– (1983)
[11] HUBER R. R., Society of Automotive Engineers Technical Paper Series, 841552, Aerospace Congress and Exposition (1984)
[12] LAWSON C. L., Solving Least Squares Problems (1974) · Zbl 0860.65028
[13] LOOZE D. P., I.E.E.E. Control Systems Magazine pp 16– (1985) · doi:10.1109/MCS.1985.1104940
[14] McMAHAN J., Air Line Pilot. (1978)
[15] NTSB, 1979 ,National transportation safety board accident report of the American airlines DCIO crash at Chicago-O’Hare International Airport, May 25, 1979 , NTAB-AAR79-17.
[16] OSTROFF A. J., Proceedingsofthe American Control Conference pp 906– (1985)
[17] OSTROFF A. J., Proceedings of the American Control Conference pp 1746– (1984)
[18] POTTS D. W., Proceedings of the 1981 I.E.E.E. National Aerospace and Electronics Conference 3 pp 1284– (1981)
[19] RATTAN K. S., Proceedings of the 1985 I.E.E.E. ’National Aerospace and Electronics Conference pp 560– (1985)
[20] RAZA S. J., Proceedingsof the A.I.A.A. Guidance and Control Conference pp 349– (1985)
[21] STEWART G. W., Introduction to Matrix Computation (1973) · Zbl 0302.65021
[22] YEDAVALLI R. K., Proceedings of the American Control Conference pp 820– (1988)
[23] ZHOU K., I.E.E.E. Transactions on Automatic Control 32 pp 621– (1987) · Zbl 0616.93060 · doi:10.1109/TAC.1987.1104667
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.