×

Exploratory analysis of contingency tables by loglinear formulation and generalizations of correspondence analysis. (English) Zbl 0718.62117

Summary: L. A. Goodman’s [Ann. Stat. 13, 10-69 (1985; Zbl 0613.62070)] loglinear formulation for bi-way contingency tables is extended to tables with or without missing cells and is used for exploratory purposes. A similar formulation is done for three-way tables and generalizations of correspondence analysis are deduced. A generalized version of Goodman’s algorithm, based on Newton’s elementary unidimensional method is used to estimate the scores in all cases.

MSC:

62H17 Contingency tables

Citations:

Zbl 0613.62070
PDFBibTeX XMLCite
Full Text: DOI

References:

[1] Bartlett, M. S. (1935). Contingency table interactions.Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Supplement 2, 248–252.
[2] Bahadur, R. R. (1961). A representation of the joint distribution of responses ton dichotomous items. In H. Solomon (Ed.), Studies in item analysis and prediction (pp. 158–168). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. · Zbl 0103.36701
[3] Bener, A. (1982). Decomposition des interactions dans dans une correspondance multiple [Decomposition of interactions in a multi-way table].Les Cahiers de l’Analyse des Données, 7, 25–32. · Zbl 0533.62048
[4] Benzécri, J. P. (1973). L’Analyse des Données: Tome 2, L’Analyse des Correspondances [Data Analysis: Vol. II, Correspondence analysis], Paris: Dunod. · Zbl 0297.62039
[5] Bishop, Y. M. M., Fienberg, S. E., & Holland, P. W. (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · Zbl 0332.62039
[6] Carroll, J. D., & Chang, J. J. (1970). Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via anN-way generalization of ”Eckart-Young” decomposition.Psychometrika, 35, 283–320. · Zbl 0202.19101 · doi:10.1007/BF02310791
[7] Caussinus, H. (1965). Contribution à l’analyse de la corrélation de deux caractères qualitatifs [Contribution to the correlation analysis of two qualitative variables].Annales de la Faculté des sciences de Toulouse, 29, 77–182.
[8] Ĉencov, N. N. (1982).Statistical decision rules and optimal inference, Vol. 53. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
[9] Choulakian, V. (1986)Analysis of multiway categorical tables by simple correspondence analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
[10] Csiszar, I. (1975).I-Divergence geometry of probability distributions and minimization problems.The Annals of Probability, 3(1), 146–158. · Zbl 0318.60013 · doi:10.1214/aop/1176996454
[11] Darroch, J. N. (1974). Multiplicative and additive interaction in contingency tables.Biometrika, 61, 207–214. · Zbl 0284.62028
[12] Daudin, J. J., & Trécourt, P. (1980). Analyse Factorielle de correspondance et modèle log-linéaire: comparaison de deux méthodes sur exemple [Correspondence analysis and loglinear model: Comparison of both methods on an example].Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 28, 5–25.
[13] de Leeuw, J. (1983). Models and methods for the analysis of correlation coefficients.Journal of Econometrics, 22, 113–117. · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90096-9
[14] Foucart, T. (1984). Analyse Factorielle de tableaux multiples [Factorial analysis of multiway tables]. Paris: Masson.
[15] Goodman, L. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries.Journal of American Statistical Association, 63, 1091–1131. · Zbl 0177.46901 · doi:10.2307/2285873
[16] Goodman, L. A. (1979). Simple models for the analysis of association in cross-classifications having ordered categories.Journal of American Statistical Association, 74, 537–552. · doi:10.2307/2286971
[17] Goodman, L. A. (1981). Association models and canonical correlation in the analysis of cross-classifications having ordered categories.Journal of American Statistical Association, 76, 320–334. · doi:10.2307/2287833
[18] Goodman, L. A. (1985). The analysis of cross-classified data having ordered and/or unordered categories: Association models, correlation models, and asymmetry models for contingency tables with or without missing entries.Annals of Statistics, 13(1), 10–69. · Zbl 0613.62070 · doi:10.1214/aos/1176346576
[19] Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and applications of correspondence analysis, London: Academic Press. · Zbl 0555.62005
[20] Harshman, R. A., Ladefoged, P., & Goldstein, L. (1977). Factor analysis of tongue shapes,Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 62, 693–707. · doi:10.1121/1.381581
[21] Holland, P. W., & Thayer, D. T. (1983).Using modern statistical methods to improve the presentation of the annual summaries of GRE candidate background data (ETS Research Report 83-8). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
[22] Kruskal, J. B. (1983). Multilinear methods.Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, 28, 75–103.
[23] Ku, H. H., & Kullback, S. (1968). Interaction in multidimensional contingency tables: An information theoretic approach.Journal Research National Bureau of Standards, 728, 159–199. · Zbl 0274.62036
[24] Lancaster, H. O. (1951). Complex contingency tables treated by the partition ofx 2.Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 13, 242–249. · Zbl 0045.22902
[25] Lancaster, H. O. (1969).The chi-squared distribution. New York: Wiley. · Zbl 0193.17802
[26] Lancaster, H. O. (1975). The multiplicative definition of interaction.Australian Journal of Statistics, 13, 36–44. · Zbl 0223.62082 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.1971.tb01240.x
[27] Lancaster, H. O. (1975). Joint probability distributions in the Meixner classes.Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 434–443. · Zbl 0315.62009
[28] Lauro, N. C., & Decarli, A. (1982). Correspondence analysis and log-linear models in multi-way contingency tables study: Some remarks on experimental data.Metron, 40, 21–234.
[29] Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Warwick, K. M. (1984). Multivariate descriptive analysis: Correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices, New York: Wiley-Interscience. · Zbl 0658.62069
[30] Leclerc, A., Chevalier, A., Luce, D., & Blanc, M. (1985). Analyses des correspondances et modèle logistique: Possibilités et intérêts d’approches complémentaires [Correspondence analysis and logistic model: Possibilities for complementary approaches].Revue de Statistique Appliquée, 33(1), 25–40.
[31] Nishisato, S. (1980). Analysis of categorical data: Dual scaling and its applications. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. · Zbl 0487.62001
[32] Roy, S. N., & Kastenbaum, M. A. (1956). On the hypothesis of ”no interaction” in a multi-way contingency table.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 27, 749–757. · Zbl 0074.14102 · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177728181
[33] Spring, D. (1985). On the second derivative test for constrained local maxima.The American Mathematical Monthly, 92, 631–643. · Zbl 0602.49017 · doi:10.2307/2323709
[34] Tenenhaus, M., & Young, F. (1985). An analysis and synthesis of multiple correspondence analysis, optimal scaling, dual scaling, homogeneity analysis and other methods for quantifying categorical multivariate data.Psychometrika, 50, 91–119. · Zbl 0585.62104 · doi:10.1007/BF02294151
[35] van der Heijden, P. G. M., & de Leeuw, J. (1985). Correspondence analysis used complementary to loglinear analysis.Psychometrika, 50, 429–447. · Zbl 0616.62082 · doi:10.1007/BF02296262
This reference list is based on information provided by the publisher or from digital mathematics libraries. Its items are heuristically matched to zbMATH identifiers and may contain data conversion errors. In some cases that data have been complemented/enhanced by data from zbMATH Open. This attempts to reflect the references listed in the original paper as accurately as possible without claiming completeness or a perfect matching.