<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06145621</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>2013b.00104</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Morgan, Debbie</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Five big ideas.</ti>
  <so>Math. Teach., No. 227, 49-50 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Association of Teachers of Mathematics (ATM), Derby</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
    <cc>B50</cc>
    <cc>D30</cc>
    <cc>D40</cc>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>professional continuing education</ut>
    <ut>professional development</ut>
    <ut>mathematical concepts</ut>
    <ut>teaching programmes</ut>
    <ut>teacher education</ut>
    <ut>mathematical thinking</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>http://www.atm.org.uk/journal/archive/mt227.html</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: Designing quality continuing professional development (CPD) for those teaching mathematics in primary schools is a challenge. If the CPD is to be built on the scaffold of five big ideas in mathematics, what might be these five big ideas? Might it just be a case of, if you tell me your five big ideas, then I'll tell you mine? Here, there is well-argued agreement on the big five, and the subsequent nature, and impact, of the CPD is described in detail. (ERIC)</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>