<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06149895</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>2013b.00453</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Choi, Chang Woo</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>A study of portfolios in New Zealand elementary school -- focused on elementary mathematics.</ti>
  <so>J. Korean Soc. Math. Educ., Ser. C, Educ. Prim. Sch. 15, No. 3, 235-248 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Korean Society of Mathematical Education, Seoul</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>KO</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
    <cc>D62</cc>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>portfolio assessment</ut>
    <ut>portfolio writing</ut>
    <ut>assessment scale</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: It has been a long time since portfolios as a new alternative assessment in elementary school are introduced to make the wrong aspect of assessment into a right aspect of traditional assessment. But many teachers seem to have not enough understanding of portfolios. Taking into account this point of view, the purpose of this paper is to search what kind of suggestive points are to give and what is the fundamental difference with the portfolios we have already known by making an observation of consisting portfolios and cases carried out in New Zealand elementary schools.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>