<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06145616</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>2013b.00768</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Murphy, Amanda</au>
    <au>Terrizzi, Marissa</au>
    <au>Cormas, Peter</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Getting beyond the guess.</ti>
  <so>Math. Teach., No. 227, 27-30 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Association of Teachers of Mathematics (ATM), Derby</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
    <cc>K52</cc>
    <cc>D82</cc>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>probability</ut>
    <ut>grade 4</ut>
    <ut>prior learning</ut>
    <ut>elementary school mathematics</ut>
    <ut>knowledge level</ut>
    <ut>mathematical concepts</ut>
    <ut>problem solving</ut>
    <ut>prediction</ut>
    <ut>teaching methods</ut>
    <ut>teaching standards</ut>
    <ut>stochastics</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>http://www.atm.org.uk/journal/archive/mt227.html</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: ``Probability is a difficult concept to teach, because children and adults find it counterintuitive." This is impetus to consider the detailed planning of a set of lessons with a ``mixed", in many senses, group of fourth graders. Can the use of prior experience, and the knowledge associated with that experience, make probability a concept that is more intuitive? The outcomes reported here would suggest that is the case, in all probability! (ERIC)</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>