Result 1 to 20 of 146 total
Can file level characteristics help identify system level fault-proneness? (English)
Eder, Kerstin (ed.) et al., Hardware and software: verification and testing. 7th international Haifa verification conference, HVC 2011, Haifa, Israel, December 6‒8, 2011. Revised selected papers. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-34187-8/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7261, 176-189 (2012).
1
Automated generation of test cases using a performability model (English)
IET Software 5, No. 2, 113-119 (2011).
2
Does measuring code change improve fault prediction? (English)
PROMISE, 2 (2011).
3
Empirical software engineering research - the good, the bad, the ugly (English)
ESEM, 1-9 (2011).
4
Comparing the effectiveness of several modeling methods for fault prediction. (English)
Empir. Softw. Eng. 15, No. 3, 277-295 (2010).
5
Methods and opportunities for rejuvenation in aging distributed software systems (English)
Journal of Systems and Software 83, No. 9, 1568-1578 (2010).
6
We’re finding most of the bugs, but what are we missing? (English)
ICST, 313-322 (2010).
7
Programmer-based fault prediction (English)
PROMISE, 19 (2010).
8
Software fault prediction tool (English)
ISSTA, 275-278 (2010).
9
Monitoring for security intrusion using performance signatures (English)
WOSP/SIPEW, 93-104 (2010).
10
Software testing research and software engineering education (English)
FoSER, 273-276 (2010).
11
ACM-W celebrates women in computing. (English)
Commun. ACM 52, No. 6, 5 (2009).
12
Progress in automated software defect prediction. (English)
Chockler, Hana (ed.) et al., Hardware and software: Verification and testing. 4th international Haifa verification conference, HVC 2008, Haifa, Israel, October 27‒30, 2008. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-01701-8/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5394, 200-204 (2009).
13
The automated generation of test cases using an extended domain based reliability model (English)
AST, 44-52 (2009).
14
Does calling structure information improve the accuracy of fault prediction? (English)
MSR, 61-70 (2009).
15
Do too many cooks spoil the broth? using the number of developers to enhance defect prediction models. (English)
Empir. Softw. Eng. 13, No. 5, 539-559 (2008).
16
What can fault prediction do for YOU? (English)
Beckert, Bernhard (ed.) et al., Tests and proofs. Second international conference, TAP 2008, Prato, Italy, April 9‒11, 2008. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-540-79123-2/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4966, 18-29 (2008).
17
Comparing the effectiveness of testing techniques. (English)
Hierons, Robert M. (ed.) et al., Formal methods and testing. An outcome of the FORTEST network. Revised selected papers. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-540-78916-1/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4949, 271-291 (2008).
18
Comparing methods to identify defect reports in a change management database (English)
DEFECTS, 27-31 (2008).
19
What can fault prediction do for YOU? (English)
TAP, 18-29 (2008).
20
Result 1 to 20 of 146 total
Start
Contact
Print
General Help
