Result 1 to 20 of 27 total
Dialectical proofs for constrained argumentation (English)
COMMA, 159-170 (2010).
1
Computational models of argument. Proceedings of COMMA 2008. 2nd international conference on computational models of argument, Toulouse, France, May 28‒30, 2008. (English)
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 172. Amsterdam: IOS Press (ISBN 978-1-58603-859-5/hbk). ix, 429~p. EUR~150.00; \sterling~105.00; \$~210.00 (2008).
2
A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information. (English)
Rahwan, Iyad (ed.) et al., Argumentation in multi-agent systems. 4th international workshop, ArgMAS 2007, Honolulu, HI, USA, May 15, 2007. Revised selected and invited papers. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-540-78914-7/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4946. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 63-79 (2008).
3
Asking the right question: forcing commitment in examination dialogues (English)
COMMA, 49-60 (2008).
4
Computational models of argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, Toulouse, France, May 28-30, 2008 (English)
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications: COMMA 172 (2008).
5
Audiences in argumentation frameworks. (English)
Artif. Intell. 171, No. 1, 42-71 (2007).
6
Dialectical proof theories for the credulous prudent preferred semantics of argumentation. (English)
Mellouli, Khaled (ed.), Symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty. 9th European conference, ECSQARU 2007, Hammamet, Tunisia, October 31‒November 2, 2007. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-540-75255-4/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 4724. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 271-282 (2007).
7
Dialectical proof theories for the credulous prudent preferred semantics of argumentation (English)
ECSQARU, 271-282 (2007).
8
A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information (English)
ArgMAS, 63-79 (2007).
9
Arguing for gaining access to information (English)
AAMAS, 20 (2007).
10
Determining preferences through argumentation. (English)
Bandini, Stefania (ed.) et al., AI$^*$IA 2005: advances in artificial intelligence. 9th congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Milan, Italy, September 21‒23, 2005. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 3-540-29041-9/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3673. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 98-109 (2005).
11
Explaining preferences with argument positions (English)
IJCAI, 1560-1561 (2005).
12
Discovering inconsistency through examination dialogues (English)
IJCAI, 1680-1681 (2005).
13
Determining preferences through argumentation (English)
AI*IA, 98-109 (2005).
14
Law-governed linda as a semantics for agent dialogue protocols (English)
AAMAS, 1257-1258 (2005).
15
On sceptical versus credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems. (English)
Alferes, José Júlio (ed.) et al., Logics in artificial intelligence. 9th European conference, JELIA 2004, Lisbon, Portugal, September 27‒30, 2004. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 3-540-23242-7/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3229. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 462-473 (2004).
16
On sceptical versus credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems (English)
JELIA, 462-473 (2004).
17
Characterization of semantics for argument systems (English)
KR, 183-193 (2004).
18
On sceptical vs credulous acceptance for abstract argument systems (English)
NMR, 134-139 (2004).
19
Checking the acceptability of a set of arguments (English)
NMR, 59-64 (2004).
20
Result 1 to 20 of 27 total
Start
Contact
Print
General Help
