<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>05874507</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>05874507</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Zhang, Chunming</au>
    <au>Fan, Jianqing</au>
    <au>Yu, Tao</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Multiple testing via $\mathrm{FDR}_L$ for large-scale imaging data.</ti>
  <so>Ann. Stat. 39, No. 1, 613-642 (2011).</so>
  <py>2011</py>
  <pu>Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Beachwood, OH</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>brain fMRI</ut>
    <ut>false discovery rate</ut>
    <ut>median filtering</ut>
    <ut>$p$-value</ut>
    <ut>sensitivity</ut>
    <ut>specificity</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1214/10-AOS848</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: The multiple testing procedure plays an important role in detecting the presence of spatial signals for large-scale imaging data. Typically, the spatial signals are sparse but clustered. This paper provides empirical evidence that for a range of commonly used control levels, the conventional false discovery rate (FDR) procedure can lack the ability to detect statistical significance, even if the $p$-values under the true null hypotheses are independent and uniformly distributed; more generally, ignoring the neighboring information of spatially structured data will tend to diminish the detection effectiveness of the FDR procedure.  This paper first introduces a scalar quantity to characterize the extent to which the ``lack of identification phenomenon'' (LIP) of the FDR procedure occurs. Second, we propose a new multiple comparison procedure, called FDR$_L$, to accommodate the spatial information of neighboring $p$-values, via a local aggregation of $p$-values. Theoretical properties of the FDR$_L$ procedure are investigated under weak dependence of $p$-values. It is shown that the FDR$_L$ procedure alleviates the LIP of the FDR procedure, thus substantially facilitating the selection of more stringent control levels. Simulation evaluations indicate that the FDR$_L$ procedure improves the detection sensitivity of the FDR procedure with little loss in detection specificity. The computational simplicity and detection effectiveness of the FDR$_L$ procedure are illustrated through a real brain fMRI dataset.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>