Summary: In “Functional unparsing” [J. Funct. Program. 8, No.~6, 621‒625 (1998; Zbl 0928.68018)], {\it O. Danvy} presented a type-safe printf function using continuations and an accumulator to achieve the effect of dependent types. The key technique employed in Danvy’s solution is the non-standard use of continuations: not all of its calls are tail calls, i.e., it uses delimited continuations. Against this backdrop, we present three new solutions to the printf problem: a simpler one that also uses delimited continuations but that does not use an accumulator, and the corresponding two in direct style with the delimited-control operators, shift and reset. These two solutions are the direct-style counterparts of the two continuation-based ones. The last solution pinpoints the essence of Danvy’s solution: shift is used to change the answer type of delimited continuations. Besides providing a new application of shift and reset, the solutions in direct style raise a key issue in the typing of first-class delimited continuations and require Danvy and Filinski’s original type system. The resulting types precisely account for the behavior of printf.