<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06084911</id>
  <dt>a</dt>
  <an>06084911</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Sankaran, Abhisekh</au>
    <au>Adsul, Bharat</au>
    <au>Madan, Vivek</au>
    <au>Kamath, Pritish</au>
    <au>Chakraborty, Supratik</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Preservation under substructures modulo bounded cores.</ti>
  <so>Ong, Luke (ed.) et al., Logic, language, information and computation. 19th international workshop, WoLLIC 2012, Buenos Aires, Argentina, September 3--6, 2012. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-32620-2/pbk). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7456, 291-305 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Berlin: Springer</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>model theory</ut>
    <ut>first order logic</ut>
    <ut>preservation theorem</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32621-9_22</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: We investigate a model-theoretic property that generalizes the classical notion of preservation under substructures. We call this property preservation under substructures modulo bounded cores, and present a syntactic characterization via $\Sigma_2^0$ sentences for properties of arbitrary structures definable by FO sentences. Towards a sharper characterization, we conjecture that the count of existential quantifiers in the $\Sigma_2^0$ sentence equals the size of the smallest bounded core. We show that this conjecture holds for special fragments of FO and also over special classes of structures. We present a (not FO-definable) class of finite structures for which the conjecture fails, but for which the classical {\L}o\'s-Tarski preservation theorem holds. As a fallout of our studies, we obtain combinatorial proofs of the {\L}o\'s-Tarski theorem for some of the aforementioned cases.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>