<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>05571828</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>05571828</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Corradini, Flavio</au>
    <au>Cacciagrano, Diletta</au>
    <au>Palamidessi, Catuscia</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Explicit fairness in testing semantics.</ti>
  <so>Log. Methods Comput. Sci. 5, No. 2, Paper 15, 27 p., electronic only (2009).</so>
  <py>2009</py>
  <pu>Logical Methods in Computer Science c/o Institute of Theoretical Computer Science, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.2168/LMCS-5(2:15)2009</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: We investigate fair computations in the pi-calculus. Following Costa and Stirling's approach for CCS-like languages, we consider a method to label process actions in order to filter out unfair computations. We contrast the existing fair-testing notion with those that naturally arise by imposing weak and strong fairness. This comparison provides insight about the expressiveness of the various `fair' testing semantics and about their discriminating power.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>