<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>05977561</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>05977561</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Beyersdorff, Olaf</au>
    <au>Meier, Arne</au>
    <au>M\"uller, Sebastian</au>
    <au>Thomas, Michael</au>
    <au>Vollmer, Heribert</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Proof complexity of propositional default logic.</ti>
  <so>Arch. Math. Logic 50, No. 7-8, 727-742 (2011).</so>
  <py>2011</py>
  <pu>Springer-Verlag, Berlin</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>default logic</ut>
    <ut>sequent calculus</ut>
    <ut>proof complexity</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1007/s00153-011-0245-8</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: Default logic is one of the most popular and successful formalisms for non-monotonic reasoning. In 2002, Bonatti and Olivetti introduced several sequent calculi for credulous and skeptical reasoning in propositional default logic. In this paper we examine these calculi from a proof-complexity perspective. In particular, we show that the calculus for credulous reasoning obeys almost the same bounds on the proof size as Gentzen's system $LK$. Hence proving lower bounds for credulous reasoning will be as hard as proving lower bounds for $LK$. On the other hand, we show an exponential lower bound to the proof size in Bonatti and Olivetti's enhanced calculus for skeptical default reasoning.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>