@inbook {IOPORT.06104144,
    author       = {Joshi, Manish and Lingras, Pawan},
    title        = {Evidential clustering or rough clustering: the choice is yours.},
    year         = {2012},
    booktitle    = {Rough sets and knowledge technology. 7th international conference, RSKT 2012, Chengdu, China, August 17--20, 2012. Proceedings},
    isbn         = {978-3-642-31899-3},
    pages        = {123-128},
    publisher    = {Berlin: Springer},
    doi          = {10.1007/978-3-642-31900-6_16},
    abstract     = {Summary: A crisp cluster does not share an object with other clusters. But in real life situations for several applications such rigidity is not acceptable. Hence, Fuzzy and Rough variations of a popular K-means algorithm are proposed to obtain non-crisp clustering solutions. An Evidential c-means proposed by Masson and Denoeux [6] in the theoretical framework of belief functions uses Fuzzy c-means (FCM) to build upon basic belief assignments to determine cluster membership. On the other hand, Rough clustering uses the concept of lower and upper approximation to synthesize clusters. A variation of popular K-means algorithm namely Rough k-means (RKM) is proposed and experimented with various datasets. In this paper we analyzed both the algorithms using synthetic, real and standard datasets to determine similarities of these two clustering approaches and focused on the strengths of each approach.},
    identifier   = {06104144},
}