<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>05998433</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>05998433</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Zhuk, D.N.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>A criterion for the decidability of the $A$-completeness problem for definite automata.</ti>
  <so>Dokl. Math. 84, No. 1, 447-449 (2011); translation from Dokl. Akad. Nauk 439, No. 1, 18-20 (2011).</so>
  <py>2011</py>
  <pu>Maik Nauka/Interperiodica, Moscow; Pleiades Publishing, New York; Springer, Secaucus, NJ</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>definite automata</ut>
    <ut>algorithmic decidability</ut>
    <ut>A-completeness</ut>
    <ut>Boolean functions</ut>
    <ut>automatic structures</ut>
    <ut>monadic second-order logic</ut>
    <ut>push-down machines</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1134/S1064562411040065</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>A function $T: (E_{2}^{n})^{\infty}\to E_{2}^{\infty}$ with an input sequence $(\bold{x}(1),\bold{x}(2),\dots) \in (E_{2}^{n})^{\infty}$ and an output sequence $(y(1),y(2),\dots)\in E_{2}^{\infty}$ is called a definite automaton with $n$ inputs of height $h$ if there are functions $f_{j}: (E_{2}^{n})^j \to E_{2}$, $j=1,2,\dots ,h$, such that $y(i) = f_{i}(\bold{x}(1), \bold{x}(2),\dots, \bold{x}(i))$ if $i\leq h$, and $y(i) = f_{h}(\bold{x}(i-h+1),\bold{x}(i-h+2),\dots,\bold{x}(i))$ if $i>h$. Let $\mathcal{P}_{a}$ be the set of all definite automata. Any definite automaton can be obtained by superposition operations from Boolean functions and delays. Each Boolean function is associated with a definite automaton of height 1. Let $t\in\mathbb{N}=\{1,2,3,\dots\}$. Two automata $T_{1}$ and $T_{2}$ with $n$ inputs are $t$-equal if they coincide for words of length $t$. Let $[M]_{t}$ be the set of all definite automata that are $t$-equal to those obtained from $M$ by superposition operations. A set $M$ is $A$-complete if $[M]_{t}=\mathcal{P}_{a}$ for any $t$. Let $F$ be a clone of Boolean functions. The $A$-completeness($F$) problem is as follows: given a finite system $V$ of definite automata, determine whether or not the system $F\bigcup V$ is $A$-complete. For $m\geq 2$, let $f_{m}(x_{1},x_{2},\dots, x_{m+1}) = \bigvee_{i=1}^{m+1}x_{1}\dots x_{i-1}x_{i+1}\dots x_{m+1}$ and $(h_{m})^{*}$ be the dual of the function $h$. Theorem. The $A$-completeness($F$) problem is algorithmically decidable if and only if, for a certain $f\in\{h_{2}, x+y+z, h_{3}, (h_{3})^{*}\}$, it is true that $f\in F$.</ab>
    <rv>Alex Nabebin (Moskva)</rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>