<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>02144301</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>02144301</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Veloso, Paulo A.S.</au>
    <au>Veloso, Sheila R.M.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Functional interpretation of logics for `generally'.</ti>
  <so>Log. J. IGPL 12, No. 6, 627-640 (2004).</so>
  <py>2004</py>
  <pu>Oxford University Press, Oxford</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>theorem proving</ut>
    <ut>vague notions</ut>
    <ut>generalized quantifier</ut>
    <ut>qualitative reasoning</ut>
    <ut>functional interpretation</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1093/jigpal/12.6.627</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: Logics for `generally' are intended to express some vague notions, such as `generally', `several', `many', `most', etc., by means of the new generalized quantifier $\nabla$ and to reason about assertions with `generally' (important issues in qualitative reasoning). We introduce the idea of functional interpretation for `generally' and show that representative functions (akin to Skolem functions) enable elimination of $\nabla$ and reduce consequence to classical theories. Thus, one can use proof procedures and theorem provers for classical first-order logic to reason about assertions involving `generally'.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>