<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>05868750</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>05868750</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Andreani, Roberto</au>
    <au>Mart{\'\i}nez, J.M.</au>
    <au>Svaiter, B.F.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>A new sequential optimality condition for constrained optimization and algorithmic consequences.</ti>
  <so>SIAM J. Optim. 20, No. 6, 3533-3554 (2010).</so>
  <py>2010</py>
  <pu>Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>nonlinear programming</ut>
    <ut>optimality condition</ut>
    <ut>approximate KKT conditions</ut>
    <ut>constraint qualification</ut>
    <ut>stopping criteria</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1137/090777189</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>The authors provide improved Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions (KKT) in limit form for the nonlinear optimization problem $$\text{Minimize}\quad f(x)\text{ subject to }h(x)= 0,\ g(x)\le 0,\tag P$$ where $f:\bbfR^n\to \bbfR$, $h: \bbfR^n\to \bbfR^m$, $g: \bbfR^n\to \bbfR^p$ have continuous first derivatives. In detail, a feasible point $x^*$ fulfills the ``complementary approximate Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions'' (CAKKT) if there exist sequences $\{x^k\}\subset\bbfR^n$, $\{\lambda^k\}\subset\bbfR^m$ and $\{\mu^k\}\subset \bbfR^p_+$ such that $$\lim_{k\to \infty} s^k= x^*,$$ $$\lim_{k\to \infty}\Vert\nabla f(x^k)+ \nabla h(x^k)\lambda^k+\nabla gf(x^k)\mu^k\Vert= 0,$$ $$\align \lim_{k\to \infty}\mu^k_i g_i(x^k)= 0\quad &\text{for all }i= 1,\dots, p,\\ \lim_{k\to\infty} \lambda^k_i h_i(x^k)= 0\quad &\text{for all }i= 1,\dots, m.\endalign$$ Obviously, CAKKT are satisfied if the classical KKT hold. In the main theorems of the paper it is proved that 1. a minimizer of (P) fulfills CAKKT -- without constraint qualification, 2. if a constraint qualification is satisfied then CAKKT are sufficient for KKT, 3. CAKKT are stronger than other known approximate KKT, 4. in the convex-affine case CAKKT are sufficient for minimality. It is pointed out that optimization methods (e.g. the augmented Lagrangian method under suitable assumptions) which produces CAKKT sequences are more efficient.</ab>
    <rv>J\"org Thierfelder (Ilmenau)</rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>