<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06030857</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>06030857</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Chiniforooshan, Ehsan</au>
    <au>Kari, Lila</au>
    <au>Xu, Zhi</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Pseudopower avoidance.</ti>
  <so>Fundam. Inform. 114, No. 1, 55-72 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Polish Mathematical Society, Warsaw; IOS Press, Amsterdam</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>pseudopower</ut>
    <ut>pseudosquare</ut>
    <ut>pseudocube</ut>
    <ut>antimorphic involution</ut>
    <ut>pattern avoidance</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>http://iospress.metapress.com/content/h5tn757282135032/fulltext.html</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: Repetition avoidance has been intensely studied since Thue's work in the early 1900's. In this paper, we consider another type of repetition, called pseudopower, inspired by the Watson-Crick complementarity property of DNA sequences. A DNA single strand can be viewed as a string over the four-letter alphabet $\{A,C,G, T\}$, wherein $A$ is the complement of $T$, while $C$ is the complement of $G$. Such a DNA single strand will bind to a reverse complement DNA single strand, called its Watson-Crick complement, to form a helical double-stranded DNA molecule. The Watson-Crick complement of a DNA strand is deducible from, and thus informationally equivalent to, the original strand. We use this fact to generalize the notion of the power of a word by relaxing the meaning of ``sameness'' to include the image through an antimorphic involution, the model of DNA Watson-Crick complementarity. Given a finite alphabet $\Sigma $, an antimorphic involution is a function $\theta : \Sigma ^{*} \rightarrow \Sigma ^{*}$ which is an involution, i.e., $\theta ^{2}$ equals the identity, and an antimorphism, i.e., $\theta (uv) = \theta (v)\theta (u)$, for all u $\in \Sigma ^{*}$. For a positive integer $k$, we call a word $w$ a pseudo-$k$th-power with respect to $\theta $ if it can be written as $w = u_1 \dots u_k$, where for $1 \leq i, j, \leq k$ we have either $u_i = u_j $ or $u_i = \theta (u_j)$. The classical $k$th-power of a word is a special case of a pseudo-$k$th-power, where all the repeating units are identical. We first classify the alphabets $\Sigma $ and the antimorphic involutions $\theta $ for which there exist arbitrarily long pseudo-$k$th-power-free words. Then we present efficient algorithms to test whether a finite word $w$ is pseudo-$k$th-power-free.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>