id: 06115833 dt: a an: 06115833 au: Wang, Jin-Dong; Sun, Xiao-Gong ti: Analyzing and predicting interannual variability in nearshore topographic field on large scales by EOF and ANN. so: Cao, Bing-Yuan (ed.) et al., Quantitative logic and soft computing 2010. Vol. 2. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference (QL \& SC 2010), Xiamen, China, October 22‒25, 2010. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 978-3-642-15659-5/pbk; 978-3-642-15660-1/ebook). Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing 82, 603-612 (2010). py: 2010 pu: Berlin: Springer la: EN cc: ut: EOF; ANN; interannual variability; nearshore topography; the yellow river delta ci: li: doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15660-1_61 ab: Summary: Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOF) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) are performed for investigating and predicting interannual variability in nearshore topographic field around the Yellow River Delta. EOF and ANN are particularly effective at reproducing the observed topographic features around either modern or historical river mouths where the nearshore topography has experienced significantly intense interannual changes during the last thirty decades. In general, the coastal land around the modern river mouths has extended toward the sea and the seafloor has been elevated due to accumulation of a large amount of sediment transported by the modern Yellow River. On the other hand, the coast and the seafloor around the historical river mouths have been eroded quickly by tidal current, waves and storms due to lack of sediment supply. The observed spatial patterns of nearshore topography are well captured qualitatively and quantitatively by dominant eigenvectors of EOF. The EOF principal components indicating temporal variation in dominant eigenvectors are effectively fitted and predicted by using the observed river-related data as the input to ANN. The topographic fields either for the “missing” years or for the “future” years can then be estimated by linear combination of fixed dominant eigenvectors and fitted principal components. As a result, the fitting and predicting errors reach as low as 2.9\% and 5.6\%, respectively. rv: