<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06054428</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>06054428</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Kreuzer, Alexander P.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Primitive recursion and the chain antichain principle.</ti>
  <so>Notre Dame J. Formal Logic 53, No. 2, 245-265 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN; Duke University Press, Durham, NC</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>proof mining</ut>
    <ut>chain-antichain principle</ut>
    <ut>conservation</ut>
    <ut>bar recursion</ut>
    <ut>Erd\H{o}s-Moser principle</ut>
    <ut>tournament</ut>
    <ut>CAC</ut>
    <ut>WKL</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1215/00294527-1715716</li>
    <li>euclid:ndjfl/1336588253</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>The author proves that $\mathrm{WKL}^\omega_0+\mathrm{CAC}$ (weak K\"onig's lemma extended to finite types plus the chain-antichain principle) is $\Pi^0_2$-conservative over primitive recursive arithmetic using a variant of Howard's ordinal analysis of bar recursion. An immediate corollary is that CAC does not imply induction for $\Sigma^0_2$ formulas. An earlier, forcing-based proof of the corollary can be found in [{\it C. T. Chong}, {\it T. A. Slaman} and {\it Y. Yang}, ``$\Pi^1_1$-conservation of combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs", Adv. Math. 230, No. 3, 1060--1077 (2012; Zbl 06059021)]. The paper also discusses the Erd\H{o}s-Moser (tournament) principle.</ab>
    <rv>Jeffry L. Hirst (Boone)</rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>