<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06109896</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>06109896</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Dourado, Mitre Costa</au>
    <au>Rautenbach, Dieter</au>
    <au>Pereira de S\'a, Vin{\'\i}cius Gusm\~ao</au>
    <au>Szwarcfiter, Jayme Luiz</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>On the geodetic Radon number of grids.</ti>
  <so>Discrete Math. 313, No. 1, 111-121 (2013).</so>
  <py>2013</py>
  <pu>Elsevier Science B.V. (North-Holland), Amsterdam</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>Radon partition</ut>
    <ut>Radon number</ut>
    <ut>geodetic convexity</ut>
    <ut>Manhattan distance</ut>
    <ut>grid graph</ut>
    <ut>Cartesian product</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1016/j.disc.2012.09.007</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: It is NP-hard to determine the Radon number of graphs in the geodetic convexity. However, for certain classes of graphs, this well-known convexity parameter can be determined efficiently. In this paper, we focus on geodetic convexity spaces built upon $d$-dimensional grids, which are the Cartesian products of $d$ paths. After revisiting a result of Eckhoff concerning the Radon number of $\Bbb R^{d}$ in the convexity defined by Manhattan distance, we present a series of theoretical findings that disclose some very nice combinatorial aspects of the problem for grids. We also give closed expressions for the Radon number of the product of $P_{2}$'s and the product of $P_{3}$'s, as well as computer-aided results covering the Radon number of all possible Cartesian products of d paths for $d\le 9$.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>