id: 01784668
dt: a
an: 01784668
au: Yan, C.M.; Mikhailov, L.
ti: The priorities aggregation approach in unequal power group decision making.
so: Köksalan, Murat (ed.) et al., Multiple criteria decision making in the new
    millennium. Proceedings of the 15th international conference, MCDM,
    Ankara, Turkey, July 10-14, 2000. Berlin: Springer. Lect. Notes Econ.
    Math. Syst. 507, 304-313 (2001).
py: 2001
pu: Berlin: Springer
la: EN
cc: 
ut: analytic hierarchy process; multiple criteria decision-making
ci: 
li: 
ab: Summary: The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is one of the most popular
    methods for multiple criteria decision-making that has been also
    applied for group decision-making. The recent modifications of the AHP
    to group decision analysis deal with equal importance of the individual
    members in the team, defined as a “power” of the member. However,
    not every member of the group is an expert in all fields and providing
    a single value that represents the power of the member regarding all
    criteria is inappropriate. Each member should have different power
    values for the different criteria. A new approach is proposed to
    aggregate the priorities concerning different criteria provided by
    members having number of different powers. “The members submit
    judgments regarding the criteria, while the priorities are derived by
    standard prioritization method, used in the AHP. Then these priorities
    are aggregated using a new weighted geometrical mean approach. The main
    advantage of this approach is that it can deal with incomplete data.
    Examples are included to evaluate the improvements.
rv: