<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>01727086</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>01727086</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Servedio, R.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>PAC analogues of Perceptron and Winnow via boosting the margin.</ti>
  <so>Mach. Learn. 47, No. 2-3, 133-151 (2002).</so>
  <py>2002</py>
  <pu>Springer, Dordrecht</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>linear threshold functions</ut>
    <ut>PAC model algorithms</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
    <ci>Zbl 0988.68147</ci>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1023/A:1013633619373</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: We describe a novel family of PAC model algorithms for learning linear threshold functions. The new algorithms work by boosting a simple weak learner and exhibit sample complexity bounds remarkably similar to those of known online algorithms such as Perceptron and Winnow, thus suggesting that these well-studied online algorithms in some sense correspond to instances of boosting. We show that the new algorithms can be viewed as natural PAC analogues of the online $p$-norm algorithms which have recently been studied by {\it A. J. Grove}, {\it N. Littlestone} and {\it D. Schuurmans} [Mach. Learn. 43, 173--210 (2001; Zbl 0988.68147)] and {\it C. Gentile} and {\it N. Littlestone} [Proc. Twelfth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 1--11 (1999)]. As special cases of the algorithm, by taking $p=2$ and $p=\infty$ we obtain natural boosting-based PAC analogues of Perceptron and Winnow respectively. The $p= \infty$ case of our algorithm can also be viewed as a generalization (with an improsed sample complexity bound) of Jackson and Craven's PAC-model boosting-based algorithm for learning ``sparse perceptrons''. The analysis of the generalization error of the new algorithms relies on techniques from the theory of large margin classification.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>