<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>02086748</id>
  <dt>a</dt>
  <an>02086748</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Bennett, David J.</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Effects of navigation and position on task when presenting diagrams.</ti>
  <so>Hegarty, Mary (ed.) et al., Diagrammatic representation and inference. 2nd international conference, Diagrams 2002, Callaway Gardens, GA, USA, April 18--20, 2002. Proceedings. Berlin: Springer (ISBN 3-540-43561-1). Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2317, 161-175 (2002).</so>
  <py>2002</py>
  <pu>Berlin: Springer</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>http://link.springer.de/link/service/series/0558/bibs/2317/23170161.htm</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: This paper questions how we could and should present diagrams to blind people using computer-generated sound. Using systems that present information about one part of the diagram at a time, rather than the whole, leads to two problems. The first problem is how to present information so that users can integrate the information into a coherent overall picture. The second is how to select the area to be presented. This is looked at by using a system that presents graphs representing central heating system schematics. The system presents information by user choice through either a hierarchical split of information and navigation system, or a connection oriented split of information and navigation system. Further, we have a split as to whether a simple system of presenting location of nodes is used, or not. Tasks, classified as being based on hierarchical information or connection-based information, were set using the system and the effect of the different models was recorded. It was found that there was a match of task to navigation system, but that presentation of position had no discernable effect.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>