<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<item>
  <id>06113695</id>
  <dt>j</dt>
  <an>06113695</an>
  <augroup>
    <au>Kristiansen, Lars</au>
    <au>Mender, Bedeho Mesghina Wolde</au>
  </augroup>
  <ti>Non-determinism in G\"odel's system $T$.</ti>
  <so>Theory Comput. Syst. 51, No. 1, 85-105 (2012).</so>
  <py>2012</py>
  <pu>Springer-Verlag, New York, NY</pu>
  <lagroup>
    <la>EN</la>
  </lagroup>
  <ccgroup>
  </ccgroup>
  <utgroup>
    <ut>complexity theory</ut>
    <ut>non-determinism</ut>
    <ut>G\"odel's System $T$</ut>
    <ut>denotational semantics</ut>
  </utgroup>
  <cigroup>
  </cigroup>
  <ligroup>
    <li>doi:10.1007/s00224-011-9377-9</li>
  </ligroup>
  <abgroup>
    <ab>Summary: The calculus $T^-$ is a successor-free version of G\"odel's $T$. It is well known that a number of important complexity classes, like e.g. the classes LOGSPACE, P, LINSPACE, ETIME and PSPACE, are captured by natural fragments of $T^-$ and related calculi. We introduce the calculus $T^{\backsim}$, which is a non-deterministic variant of $T^-$, and compare the computational power of $T^{\backsim}$ and $T^-$. First, we provide a denotational semantics for $T^{\backsim}$ and prove this semantics to be adequate. Furthermore, we prove that LINSPACE $\subseteq \mathcal {G}^{\backsim}_0\subseteq$ NLINSPACE and ETIME $\subseteq \mathcal {G}^{\backsim}_1 \subseteq$ ESPACE where $\mathcal {G}^{\backsim}_0$ and $\mathcal {G}^{\backsim}_1$ are classes of problems decidable by certain fragments of $T^{\backsim}$. (It is proved elsewhere that the corresponding fragments of $T^-$ equal respectively LINSPACE and ETIME.) Finally, we show a way to interpret $T^{\backsim}$ in $T^-$.</ab>
    <rv></rv>
  </abgroup>
</item>